Large Diesel Engine Operators
“RailAmerica was
pleased to test the Mach 3 SEFS-HD ecological fuel additive product
throughout the month of August on four of our locomotives, namely 2
General Motors’ EMD GP 38 of 2,000 HP and 2 GP 40 of 3,000 HP
operating from our San Diego depot. The results of the tests far
exceeded our expectations. We recorded a diesel fuel savings
in the range of 23%±3% over a 20 day operational period on all these
four locomotives.”
“The test process
consisted of operating these four locomotives regularly for 20 days
between August 2nd and August 31st 2007. Each
locomotive did a round trip of 60 miles per day up hill and down
hill between San Diego and San Ysidro for a total traveled distance
of 4,800 miles with 5,500 gallons of diesel fuel consumed. Prior to
August and without your Mach 3 additive, the average monthly fuel
consumption was 7,500 gallons. In August and with Mach 3 SEFS-HD,
the fuel consumption was down to 5,500 gallons.”
The details of the
test results were as shown in Table 1 below:
|
|
Pre-SEFS-HD |
Post- SEFS-HD |
Monthly Δ |
Annual Δ |
|
Fuel Consumption
(Gallons) |
7,500 |
5,500 |
2,000 |
24,000 |
|
MPG (4,800 miles
total) |
0.64 |
0.87 |
|
|
|
Fuel Costs ($2.50
per Gallon) |
$18,750 |
$13,750 |
$5,000 |
$60,000 |
Table 1: SEFS-HD Test
Results in 2 EMD GP 38 and 2 GP 40 Locomotives 08/02/07 to 08/31/07
Independent Authority Test Data
Three different tests were conducted by Automotive Testing and
Development Services, following the SAE J1321 protocol. The
following tests and the results were taken directly from the test
reports, which are attached in full detail for reference.
1.
“Two medium duty Isuzu cab over box trucks were provided for test by
the client and were reported to be of the same make, model and year.
Both trucks were six-cylinder intercooled turbo diesels.”
“An approximate 16% fuel savings was demonstrated with the “Mach 3
Super EcoFuel Saver” fuel additive in this test; therefore it
appears possible that there is a beneficial fuel economy effect in
this application.”
2.
“The testing was conducted in an on-road environment, using public
highways, and based upon the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE)
J1321 (Type II) test protocol. Two Ford Taurus V-6 passenger cars
were provided for test by the client.”
“The test results show that the test vehicle, with the Super EcoFuel Saver additive mixed into its’ fuel, showed a 13% improvement in fuel economy when compared to the control vehicle.”
3.
“The vehicle was a 2005 Ford Taurus with a six cylinder engine and
approximately 41,000 miles on the odometer. The test was run in two
parts, first a baseline sequence of two tests using regular test
fuel then the SUPER ECOFUEL SAVER was added to the fuel supply, 300
miles of over the road driving was performed and the Highway tests
run twice more.”
“The test results show that the test vehicle, with SUPER ECOFUEL
SAVER additive mixed into its’ fuel, achieved a 7% reduction in
Hydrocarbon Emissions, a 33% reduction in Carbon Monoxide (CO)
emissions and a 44% reduction in Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) emissions
when compared to the results with regular fuel.”
Dave Hills Trucking
Test Plan 1 – Feasibility Test
“The test plan
consisted of two parts: feasibility and controlled. The feasibility
test was to prove the Mach 3 SFS HD re-formulator showed that it was
meeting the benefit claim of improved fuel consumption before moving
to a controlled test.”
The test results were as follows:
The driver of the truck noticed the following changes after the Mach
3 SFS HD was added to the fuel:
Test Plan 2 – Controlled Test
Three (3) trucks had been hauling dirt at Camp Pendleton for the
last couple of months. The job was temporarily halted due to
emergency work being performed to clean up the ash from the recent
fires. The authorities at the military base have a specific route
for the truckers to use, and there is no deviation allowed from this
route. The route is approximately 20 miles for a round trip. This
job is expected to be restarted within the next two weeks.
The test plan for this job is as follows:
1.
Truck 1 will not be serviced for the test.
2.
Truck 2 will be serviced before the test.
3.
Truck 3 will be the one used in the feasibility test.